
California Department of Transportationwww.dot.ca.gov/hq/TransEnhAct/>Adopted
by the California Transportation CommissionAdopted
February 1993 - revised May 2001
|
This is a 28 page document click
here to get the printable
version.
You must have Adobe Acrobat Reader
in order to view the PDF file; if you do not have
it you can go here
and get it.
|
|
|
| Section A - About the Program * |
About These Guidelines *
|
Key Points *
|
Program Overview *
Vision *
|
Public Participation *
|
|
Programming Cycles 1998-2003 *
RTPA Exchange of TEA Funds *
|
Remaining Projects from Earlier TEA
Cycles *
|
Program Procedures *
|
|
Nominating Projects *
|
| Section B - Eligibility * |
Administering Agency Eligibility *
|
Project Eligibility *
The Twelve Categories
of Activities *
|
|
Eligible Costs *
Local Funding Share (Match) *
|
Use of State Highway Account As Match *
|
When Eligible Costs Can Be Incurred/Authorization
to Proceed *
|
Preliminary Engineering What
is included/ what is excluded *
|
Right of Way (Acquisition) What
is included/ What is excluded *
|
Construction What is included/
What is excluded *
|
|
| Section C - Competition
and Approval Process * |
Eligibility Check *
|
Approval at the Federal Level *
|
| Section D - Project Administration/
Implementation * |
Implementation A Phased Process *
Preliminary Engineering Phase
Environmental Documentation *
|
Preliminary Engineering *
|
Construction Documents Design
Standards & Reviews *
|
Right of Way (Acquisition) Phase *
|
Construction Phase *
|
|
Agreements *
|
Under-Expenditures and Over-Expenditures *
|
Audits and Records Retention *
|
Invoicing *
|
Ribbon-Cutting *
|
Maintenance and Monitoring *
|
Section A
- About the Program
About
These Guidelines
These guidelines are intended
to assist agencies that will implement projects to apply
for transportation enhancement activities (TEA) funds
through the Regional Transportation Planning Agencies
(RTPAs). They explain how enhancement activities are
nominated, funded, and administered. This is not a grant
process; it is a competitive process for federal-aid
funds.
These guidelines are one of four sets
of guidelines for TEA funds for the six-year period
from 1998 through 2003. Regional Transportation Planning
Agencies receive 75 percent of the TEA dollars in California
($272 million). Each Region receives a TEA share by
formula. The other 25 percent goes to the state ($91
million).
The other three sets of state guidelines
are for:
- Caltrans projects ($41 million),
and
- Conservation Lands [Acquisition]
projects (minimum $11 million) selected by Caltrans
and the Resources Agency, and
- State Transportation Enhancement
projects (STE) ($40 million) (not to be confused with
the state-funded Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation
Program) selected by the Resources Agency.
Key
Points
+ This is a reimbursable program,
+ A local funding share (match)
is required in each phase of the project; administering
agencies must commit to cover cost increases if
the project turns out to be underfunded;
+ Organizations may nominate
projects, in partnership, through a public agency
that is willing and able to take responsibility
for carrying out and maintaining the project;
+ Improvements to private property
and commercial facilities are not eligible;
+ Projects must comply with
federal environmental requirements and with other
federal regulations, as outlined in the Local Assistance
Procedures Manual.
+ Suggested minimum project
size is $100,000 in federal funds, making the minimum
overall project cost approximately $114,000. Regional
agencies may consider stand-alone projects of unusual
merit in the $50,000 - $100,000 range, and work
of any size that will be added into a federal transportation
improvement contract.
+ Generally, this is a capital
improvement program; it is not for planning, maintenance,
equipment or operations.
Program
Overview
California will receive approximately
$60 million per year for six years ($363 million total)
under the Transportation Equity Act for the Twenty-first
Century (TEA-21). This represents a 10 percent set-aside
of one of the TEA-21 programs, the Surface Transportation
Program funds. This money is available only for transportation
enhancement activities.
Procedures and requirements for developing
federal-aid projects are substantially more involved
in time and money than the requirements for claiming
state funds. Administering agencies must follow the
requirements of title 23, United State Code. These are
contained in the Local Assistance Procedures Manual,
accessible from the internet at: www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/public.htm.
The Manual is also available in hard
copy for $32 from the Caltrans Publications Unit, 1900
Royal Oaks Drive, Sacramento, California 95815 (Phone:
916-445-3520). Other manuals that may apply to a specific
project are Right of Way: Procedures for Developing
Local Federal-Aid Highway Projects, Encroachment
Permits, or Environmental Analysis: Procedures
for Developing Local Federal-Aid Highway Projects.
In addition, training is sometimes available to public
agencies for federal-aid projects through the California
Technical Assistance Program. For details, see the UC
Berkeley Institute of Transportation Studies website
at: www.its.berkeley.edu/techtransfer/shortcourses.html.
For additional information about applying
for TEA funds, see the TEA website at www.dot.ca.gov/hq/TransEnhAct/.
Transportation enhancement funds are
to be used for transportation-related projects that
enhance quality-of-life, in or around transportation
facilities. Projects must be over and above required
mitigation and normal transportation projects, and the
project must be directly related to the transportation
system. The program should have a quality-of-life benefit
while providing the greatest benefit to the greatest
number of people.
Transportation enhancement activities
are a means to integrate more creatively and sensitively
transportation facilities into their surrounding communities.
What distinguishes transportation enhancement activities
from other worthwhile "quality of life" and
environmental activities is their potential to create
a transportation experience that is more than merely
adequate. At the same time they may protect the environment
and provide a more aesthetic, pleasant and improved
interface between the transportation system for the
communities and people adjacent to transportation facilities.
Doing this will require expanded partnerships on all
levels.
TEA program decisions must be made
in an open public decision process, with an opportunity
for parties interested in the TEA program to present
comments.
Interested parties and proponents of
transportation enhancement activities are invited to
submit project ideas for application through their local
public agencies to their respective Regional Transportation
Planning Agencies (RTPAs). A list of RTPAs will be included
in the TEA website: www.dot.ca.gov/hq/TransEnhAct.
Potential opportunities for public
comment:
+ Adoption of the Federal Transportation
Improvement Programs (FTIPs)
+ Comments on Regional Transportation
Plans prior to their adoption.
+ RTPA application-scoring teams,
mostly in larger regions.
+ Comments on environmental
document draft.
A Transportation Enhancement Activities
Advisory Council to Caltrans was established in July
1993 to be an ongoing vehicle of public participation
in program implementation. It exists to identify issues
and communicate program changes to Council members
respective agencies or organizations.
Programming
Cycles 1998-2003
Regional TEA projects will now be programmed
at the regional level in Local Assistance, rather than
at the state level in the State Transportation Improvement
Program, as they were in the previous three cycles.
Regional Transportation Planning Agencies
(RTPAs, Regions) may program any type of eligible TEA
projects on their own choice of time schedule, programming
policies, application forms, and number of programming
rounds.
Most regions will have at least two
TEA cycles, one committing one-third to one-half of
the regional TEA share by 1999 and a second one by about
2001. Smaller regions with less than $1 million in TEA
share may choose to program all in one single round.
Each RTPA may choose its own deadline
for TEA applications. The Federal Highway Administration
and Federal Transit Administration must approve projects
in the Federal State Transportation Improvement Program
(FSTIP) before they may start.
Regions retain and may reprogram TEA
shares if new TEA projects in their region subsequently
fail.
Small Regions (up to 200,000 population)
that decide not to use their full TEA share may exchange
federal TEA funds to the state for state funds on an
annual basis (California Transportation Commission action
10/98). These TEA funds will be added into the state
TEA share. Other larger Regions that do not have statutory
authority for this exchange may trade TEA funds among
themselves. Regions are required to inform the Commission
and Caltrans after such trades have been made.
Small Regions may only exchange all
or a part of their federal fiscal year 1998 and 1999
TEA funds to the state during the period from October
1998 through March 1999. Subsequent exchanges will be
done annually, following distribution of annual federal
local assistance apportionments.
The Commission and Caltrans will fund
all delivered TEA projects from the first three cycles
(1996 State Transportation Improvement Program [STIP]).
Projects from the 1996 STIP not deliverable (authorized
to proceed with construction) or not delivered by September
2000 will be unprogrammed; the funds will be rescinded
and reprogrammed into the Conservation Lands (CL) share
of TEA.
The Region retains the programming
capacity, and may replace the failed TEA project(s)
with new TEA projects, or may exchange or trade TEA
funds. Regions may supplement existing (1996 STIP) TEA
projects with additional TEA funding, through their
TEA programming process.
Regions must provide Caltrans with
certain minimum information relating to all TEA projects:
+ Two copies of the application
for projects to be programmed, so Caltrans, on behalf
of Federal Highway Administration, can review for
TEA eligibility before a TEA project is amended
into the Federal State Transportation Improvement
Program (FSTIP), and can keep program administration
files.
+ The updated regional mailing
list, periodically, so Caltrans can keep a current
statewide mailing list for guidelines.
+ The regional schedule for
TEA programming cycles at least two months in advance
of the due date for applications. Caltrans will
post this information on the TEA website. (Any region
that has already issued a call for project before
the adoption of these guidelines may continue on
its present schedule.)
+ A current contact person responsible
for TEA programming.
This information can be sent to Howard
Reynolds, TEA Program Coordinator, Caltrans, 1120 N
Street, M.S. 28, Sacramento, California 95814
Nominating
Projects
Applicants send in the application
to the Regional Transportation Planning Agency on the
RTPAs application form. Regions may use the model
TEA application form and the model TEA scoring criteria
at their option.
Applicants must request an application
from the Regional Transportation Planning Agency. Deadlines
and contacts will be published in the Caltrans website
at www.dot.ca.gov/hq/TransEnhAct/.
Applicants should send four (4) copies
of the application to the Regional Transportation Planning
Agency. It can take three to six months between the
application deadline and when the project can start.
Section
B - Eligibility
Administering
Agency Eligibility
Projects shall be nominated by the
agency that will be administering the project and taking
responsibility for maintaining it. In addition, the
administering agency must be capable of entering into
a master agreement with Caltrans and must be determined
to be capable of implementing the project by the Caltrans
District Local Assistance Engineer.
This may include the Regional Transportation
Planning Agencies (RTPAs, Regions) and other federal,
state, and local public agencies, i.e. Regents of the
University of California, a county, city, city and county,
special district, public authority, transit operator,
transportation commission, county transportation authority
or joint powers authority. A joint powers authority
must be able to commit the resources of the member agencies.
Administering agencies have contractual
responsibility for carrying out to completion the enhancement
project in accordance with federal, state, and local
laws and regulations.
Administering agencies often have partners
in bringing forward enhancement projects. These partners
may be non-profit organizations that wish to be a part
of implementation or maintenance, public agencies that
are too small to meet the requirements of obtaining
a master agreement with Caltrans, or agencies that have
minimal staff to administer a federal-aid project. Others
may be partners in funding only. No matter if partners
are involved, the administering agency is the one entity
responsible for implementing the project and maintaining
it for the life of the project.
Federal and state agencies may administer
transportation enhancement activities projects. The
agency must have statutory authority to charge on a
reimbursement basis.
Project
Eligibility
All projects selected by the Regions
will be reviewed by Caltrans Headquarters TEA Program
staff for eligibility. During its review, Caltrans will
ask at least the following question.
Does the project fit the program? This
question can be answered "yes" only after
three questions are answered affirmatively. Transportation
Enchancement Activities (TEA) must meet three basic
criteria, based on instruction from the Federal Highway
Administration.
- "What is the direct relationship
to the surface transportation system?"
Projects must have at least one direct
relationship to the surface transportation system, which
consists of all forms of the intermodal system, exclusive
of aviation. This relationship may be one of function,
proximity, or impact. For example,
+ A bikeway is a functional
component of the intermodal transportation system.
+ Removal of outdoor advertising
in the viewshed of a highway is justified in light
of its proximity. (Proximity can be confusing because
any project appears eligible by virtue of being
near a roadway; however, there will be no tenuous
or contrived relationships. When the relationship
is by proximity, how does the activity significantly
enhance the transportation experience?)
+ Water pollution control alongside
an existing highway to protect or improve a drinking
water supply would qualify based on the impact of
the highway in terms of water pollution.
- "Is this over and above
a normal project?"
Enhancement activities are over and
above normal transportation projects. Typically, a normal
transportation project may include mitigation, standard
landscaping, other permit requirements and provisions
negotiated as a condition of obtaining a permit for
a normal [non-enhancement] transportation project.
Transportation enhancement activities
may not in themselves be routine or customary elements
of transportation projects or mitigation for project
impacts in compliance with the requirements of environmental,
or other federal, state, or local laws, even if those
aspects will otherwise constitute specified transportation
enhancements. Examples of non-eligible elements are:
mitigation banking, maintenance activities, and projects
to retrofit existing sidewalks for compliance with Americans
with Disabilities Act requirements.
If this proposal is an enhancement
to a larger project, check the environmental document
for these items Is the proposed enhancement part
of the project description? Is it listed as mitigation?
Is it a permit requirement? If so, the activity is not
"over and above" a normal project. Permitting
agencies might include federal agencies such as U.S.
Forest Service, Bureau of Land Management, or U.S. Corps
of Engineers. State permitting agencies might include
State Department of Fish and Game. Regional permitting
agencies might include a regional water quality control
board.
- "Which category or categories
encompass the transportation enhancement activities?"
Projects must be selected from one
or more of the twelve activities categories, only
those activities listed in U.S. Code, Title 23 Section
101(a) are eligible to be accounted for as transportation
enhancement activities. If project eligibility in these
twelve categories is not clear, the applicant will provide
reasoning for including it and a determination will
be made by the RTPA, Caltrans, and Federal Highway Administration.
The funded activities must be accessible to the general
public or targeted to a broad segment of the general
public.
The twelve categories are:
- Provision of facilities for pedestrians
and bicycles
- Provision of safety and
educational activities for pedestrians and bicyclists
- Acquisition of scenic easements
and scenic or historic sites
- Scenic or historic highway
programs (including the provision of tourist and welcome
center facilities)
- Landscaping and other scenic
beautification
- Historic preservation
- Rehabilitation and operation
of historic transportation buildings, structures or
facilities (including historic railroad facilities
and canals)
- Preservation of abandoned
railway corridors (including the conversion and use
thereof for pedestrian or bicycle trails)
- Control and removal of outdoor
advertising
- Archaeological planning
and research
- Mitigation of water pollution
due to highway runoff or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife
mortality while maintaining habitat connectivity
- Establishment of transportation
museums.
Enhancements development must be for
capital improvement; it cannot be a maintenance expenditure,
project with a life of less than 5 years, or a one-time
temporary improvement.
Eligibility of projects has been interpreted
broadly by Caltrans and the Federal Highway Administration.
The following discussion presents the thinking behind
decisions to define eligibility of the twelve categories.
1. Provision of facilities for pedestrians
and bicycles.
This category provides an opportunity
to create linkages in the existing transportation system
by funding bicycle and pedestrian modes of travel. The
bicycle and pedestrian modes connect people to activity
centers, such as businesses, schools, shopping and recreation
areas, and to other modes.
Projects accommodate bicyclists or
pedestrians beyond or in addition to what is necessary
for safe accommodation. This includes activities that
enhance the transportation system through more aesthetic
routing or design or improving other existing facilities
to make them more usable for pedestrians and bicyclists,
such as adding bicycle parking at a rail station. The
purpose of the project must be for transportation but
if a recreation experience is gained as a result of
the transportation facility, this does not exclude the
activity from consideration under this program.
Activities are not eligible where
they are conducted as an incidental and routine part
of new transportation projects in order to accommodate
routine use by pedestrians and bicycles. Paved shoulders,
wide curb lanes, sidewalks, and curb cuts are not eligible
if incidental and routine to road construction or reconstruction;
however, Class II bicycle lanes are eligible. Projects
may not be for maintenance activities or other replacement
facilities; for example, pavement overlays on the same
alignment and same width are not eligible.
While all projects must meet the Americans
with Disabilities Act (ADA) mandate of accessibility,
projects to retrofit existing facilities solely for
conformance to accessibility standards in the California
Building Code do not qualify. Construction of neighborhood
sidewalks is regarded as normal work.
Projects for parking lots for future
bicycle or pedestrian facilities are not eligible. Projects
for standard-type bus shelters are considered normal
work. Bus shelters may be funded as a necessary and
incidental part of a streetscape project, or when they
are artist-designed.
Questions about standards for bikeway
designs or for bicycle facilities such as lockers and
parking facilities can be addressed by the Caltrans
Bicycle Coordinator at (916) 653-0036. Bikeway Planning
and Design (Section 1000 of the Highway Design Manual)
is available from the Caltrans Publications Unit, 1900
Royal Oaks Drive, Sacramento, CA, 95815. An unofficial
copy is available on the Caltrans website at www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/hdm/hdmtoc.htm.
Example of Projects: Bicycle lockers
at rail stations, bus depots, recreation facilities.
Bicycle lockers over and above standard policy at park
and ride lots. Bikeways: Class I (bike paths); Class
II (bike lanes); Class III (bike routes). Bikeways or
pedestrian paths which separate these modes of travel
from the motorized transportation system. Bike racks
on transit systems. Acquisition, development, and construction
of separate pedestrian or bicycle facilities on or off
road rights-of-way or in relation to transit facilities
are examples of eligible activity, as are improvements
to facilities that go beyond basic access and mobility.
2. Provision of safety and educational activities for
pedestrians and bicyclists
This category includes non-construction
safety-related activities and the reasonable costs to
provide safety and educational activities such as bike/pedestrian
safety training, cost of facilitators and classes. It
may also include related training materials such as
brochures, videotapes, other training aids, as well
as rent for leased space and limited staff salaries.
Long term salary participation is not eligible.
The funded activities must be accessible
to the general public or targeted to a broad segment
of the general public. The activities must show a relationship
to the surface transportation system.
Project sponsors are encouraged to
integrate safety messages and educational opportunities
for bicyclists and pedestrians into enhancement projects
through the development of campaigns, programs, educational
materials including maps and brochures, and pedestrian
and bicycle enforcement activities. Project sponsors
are encouraged to coordinate these activities with the
National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and other
modal administrations. This category is not intended
to replace or duplicate existing Section 402 funding
opportunities currently available through the State
and Community Traffic Safety Program.
Bicycle maps are an eligible activity,
and are encouraged as part of bicycle facilities funded
as Transportation Enhancement Activities.
School crossing guards, speed trailers
and radar are not eligible activities.
3. Acquisition of scenic easements
and scenic or historic sites
This category may be applied to purchase,
donation, transfer, or trade of lands which possess
significant aesthetic, historic, natural, visual, or
open space values, acquisition of which enhances the
transportation experience as part of the transportation
system, or as a substantial contribution to the transportation
viewshed.
Funds may be used for transaction costs
including appraisals, surveys, legal costs, or purchase
costs. Acquisition of scenic or historic sites includes
expenditure of funds for the purchase or the use of
funds to accept the donation, transfer, or trade of
(a) less than fee interests, for example, easements,
in land which possess significant scenic, historic,
or cultural values and (b) fee title acquisition of
such lands and any property listed in the California
Register of Historic Resources or eligible for listing
in the National Register of Historic Places.
Land acquired for its scenic qualities
must be maintained for its scenic qualities. Mechanisms
must be in place to enforce significant scenic or historic
values, and the project sponsor must agree to enforce
mechanisms to preserve them. The owner of any property
acquired must be willing to participate in a preservation
covenant attached to the deed of the property. Such
a covenant ensures that future work on the property
will respect the scenic or historic integrity of the
property.
Lands acquired for scenic purposes
may not be developed in a manner that degrades the scenic
character and quality of the site. Public access is
allowed.
The purpose of the project must be
for scenic or historic acquisition, but if a wildlife
habitat or corridor is gained as a result of the acquisition,
this does not exclude the activity from consideration
under this program.
Scenic acquisition of a degraded area
may be eligible on condition that the agency restores
the site to scenic status within this or a later project
phase. (Restoration does not have to be done using federal
enhancement funds.)
Where proposed projects appear to be
primarily park improvements with incidental transportation
enhancement activities incorporated into the park improvement
project, the transportation enhancement will be eligible,
but not the park improvement.
Example of Projects: Acquisition of
Big Sur viewsheds. San Pedro Point Viewshed. Acquisition
of a historic bridge, historic transportation terminal,
land around a historic site adjacent to a scenic highway.
Acquisition of historic properties which qualify for
protection under the National Register or California
Register or are designated in a local register.
4. Scenic or historic highway programs (including the
provision of tourist and welcome center facilities).
This category covers protection and
enhancement of designated state scenic highways or federally
designated scenic byways and state or federally eligible
or designated historic highways. Funds may be used only
for activities that will protect and enhance the scenic
and historic integrity and visitor appreciation of an
existing highway and adjacent area.
Tourist or welcome centers do not have
to be on a designated scenic or historic byway, but
must have a clear link to scenic or historic sites.
Activities eligible under the National Scenic Byways
Program are generally eligible under this category.
A historic site should have evidence of documented consultation
and concurrence with the State Historic Preservation
Officer or similar authority for determining the historicity
of a particular site.
Funding may be used for the construction
of a new facility or the restoration of an existing
facility. This includes those related construction actions
necessary to provide the facility, such as interior
fixtures and parking areas. Funds can be used to purchase
and install items which support or interpret the scenic
or historic highway program or site including brochure
racks for interpretive materials or maps or kiosks.
Funds cannot be used for statewide programs, marketing,
or promotion not related to the scenic or historic highway
program. Staffing, operation costs and maintenance are
not eligible. Items such as racks for advertising or
brochures for local or national businesses are not eligible.
Restoration of existing, or constuction of new, rest
areas are not eligible.
The visitor or welcome centers are
to be publicly owned and open to the public.
Example of Projects: Historic Pasadena
Freeway, historic bridge signing, interpretive plaques
or restoration of historic lighting standards, historic
Old Highway 50, historic Feather River Highway and historic
Euclid Avenue. Historic aesthetic treatment on retaining
walls and guardrails. Visually sensitive bridge rails
(guard rails on bridges) which meet Caltrans and FHWA
safety requirements, for use on scenic highways and
in areas of high visual sensitivity.
5. Landscaping and other scenic beautification.
This category includes landscape planning,
design and construction activities which enhance the
aesthetic or ecological resources along transportation
corridors, points of access, and lands qualifying for
other categories of transportation enhancement activities.
Architectural treatment, applied or
integrated, of transportation structures, including
bridges and highways beyond Caltrans' utilitarian design
may be considered an enhancement activity, as long as
it is beyond mitigation required to comply with CEQA,
NEPA, and other permitting agencies' requirements. The
primary purpose must be to enhance the scenic view.
Projects which blend the transportation
system into the surroundings, making the system less
intrusive, or otherwise enhance the aesthetic resources
or beauty of the transportation system may include planning,
design and construction of scenic vistas and overlooks,
restoration of historic landscapes, and public art and
design enhancements. Projects which enhance the ecological
balance along a transportation corridor include planning,
testing and planting for restoration or reintroduction
of native plant communities and appropriate adaptive
species, and the provision of interpretive information
about the federal and state agency programs through
which ecological resources are preserved.
Projects on the National Highway System
must be consistent with Caltrans' overall landscape
program and policies, and will be approved by the Caltrans
District Landscape Architect.
Projects may not be for temporary,
routine, incidental or maintenance activities such as
grass cutting, tree pruning or removal, erosion control,
screen planting, construction of noise barriers, drainage
improvement or post-construction finish
work such as replanting and reseeding.
Plantings on the State Highway System
may only be for that portion which is over and above
Caltrans' policy no. 3.5.1, dated July, 1990, for standard
planting in warranted areas.
Projects mainly for museum facility
or park development work are not eligible, although
park development elements that are necessary for and
incidental to the eligible transportation enhancement
activity, such as interpretation elements, may be considered
eligible.
Graffiti-resistant coatings do not
qualify as scenic beautification because they do not
change the appearance of the surface, they must be reapplied
at least every three to five years (a maintenance activity)
and they do not preclude the re-application of graffiti.
Example of Projects: 'Gateway' plantings
to communities. Retrofitting existing noise barriers
(built before May 22, 1992, when it became standard
practice) with landscaping. Rockwork in existing landscaping.
Replacement of a utilitarian bridge with one of appropriate
architectural qualities in a setting which calls for
more than a utilitarian design. Landscaping transplants
to move trees outside of clear zones and into more attractive,
safer locations. Sculpture or other artwork at gateway
entrance to communities or in California "Main
Street" projects. Roadside Ecological Viewing Areas.
Design and installation of visually sensitive bridge
rails (guard rails on bridges), which meet Caltrans
and FHWA safety requirements.
6. Historic preservation.
Historic, cultural properties, and
archaeological resources determined eligible for or
listed in the California Register of Historical Resources
or a locally-designated resource, if the local designation
is based on locally-adopted, written criteria, are eligible
for transportation enhancement activity funding. Section
5024.1 of the California Public Resources Code defines
the California Register as an authoritative guide in
California to be used by state and local agencies, private
groups, and citizens to identify the state's historical
resources. The California Register includes properties
determined eligible for or listed on the National Register
of Historic Places, most California State Historical
Landmarks, and State Points of Historical Interest.
In addition, the California Register may include locally
designated historic and prehistoric resources as well
as local survey inventories using the National Register
standards.
This category includes acquisition,
protection, rehabilitation, interpretation, restoration,
and stabilization or any combination of the foregoing,
of any prehistoric or historic district, site, building,
structure, landscape, or object (and artifacts and records
related to it) listed or eligible for inclusion in the
California Register or the National Register of Historic
Places.
All work must be done in compliance
with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines
for Archeology and Historic Preservation, the Secretary
of the Interior's Standards for Treatment of Historic
Properties, or the State Historic Building Code and
must be managed under the direction of professionals
meeting the standards published in the Code of Federal
Regulations, 36 CFR, Part 61. The qualifications define
minimum education and experience required to perform
eligible historic preservation activities. In some cases,
additional areas or levels of expertise may be needed
depending on the complexity of the task and the nature
of the historic properties involved.
A substantial transportation linkage
is required for a project to be considered eligible.
Projects should enhance the transportation
system by improving the ability of the public to appreciate
the historic significance of the project itself or the
area to be served by the project.
In some circumstances, the cultural
and sacred values of Native American or other ethnic
community sites may require the inclusion of additional
viewpoints. Proposals referring to such sites must be
accompanied by evidence that appropriate Native American
and ethnic community representatives have been consulted.
Incidental Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) compliance elements are eligible only as required
by the transportation enhancement project.
This category does not include reconstruction,
i.e., building replicas of historic structures or buildings.
It does not include the creation of museums, or of visitor
centers; however, restoration of a building that will
later be modified and used as a public museum is eligible.
Maintenance activities are not eligible.
A preservation project arising from
the deferring of maintenance - which was to have been
done as a condition of a previous agreement for its
preservation - will not be eligible.
Tenant improvements are not eligible
costs.
Example of Projects: Stabilizing Chitactac
Native American Village site and interpreting it to
travelers and tourists.
Restoration and interpretation along the Baja/Alta California
Mission Period Heritage Corridor. Rehabilitation of
historic buildings that serve the transportation system
as multi-modal centers. Interpretation of placer mining
at Alpha Omega Rest Area on Highway 20 and at Gold Run
Rest Area on Highway 80. Restoration of historic maritime
resources such as lighthouses. Restoration of a historic
landscape on a highway. Rehabilitation of historic places,
activities that encourage or facilitate historic interpretation
for the public of sites associated with roads and other
transportation facilities, heritage
tourism, preservation or improvement of the appearance
or quality of a historic property, district, or landscape,
assistance in providing research and educational opportunities
or related services on individual or related historical
resources.
7. Rehabilitation of historic transportation buildings,
structures or facilities (including historic railroad
facilities and canals).
Historic transportation buildings are
buildings or related structures associated with the
operation, passenger and freight use, construction or
maintenance of any mode of transportation where such
building is listed or eligible for listing in the California
Register or the National Register of Historic Places.
Structures and facilities include tunnels,
bridges, trestles, embankments, rails or other guideway,
non-operational vehicles, canal viaducts, tow paths
and locks, stations and other built transportation features
integrally related to the operation, passenger and freight
use, construction, or maintenance of any mode of transportation.
Rehabilitation means the process of
returning the property to a state which makes possible
a contemporary use while preserving the significant
historic features of that property. Subsequent conversion
costs or tenant improvements are not eligible.
Example of Projects: Santa Fe Depot
in San Diego. Central Valley railroad depots and train
stations on the San Francisco Peninsula commute. Restoration
of historic ferry terminals. Interpretive displays as
part of historic bridge replacement projects. Costs
on historic bridges over and above normal mitigation.
8. Preservation of abandoned railway corridors (for
conversion to pedestrian or bicycle trails).
This category includes the acquisition,
rehabilitation and development of corridors for public
bicycle or pedestrian use. In some cases it could allow
preservation without capital improvements, although
emphasis is placed on current enhancement value. This
category permits the development and rehabilitation
of privately-owned rail corridors to bicycle or pedestrian
facilities open to the general public without charge.
This may not be used solely for rail preservation. A
declaration of intent for future bike or pedestrian
use is required. Failure to open the lands acquired
for bicycle and pedestrian use within ten years from
the start of the right of way phase means the administering
agency will have to reimburse the Federal Highway Administration.
Example of Projects: Sacramento Northern
Railway Bicycle Trail extension. Bizz Johnson Trail
on old Southern Pacific right of way in Susanville.
Southern Pacific Santa Paula Branch Line Acquisition.
Northwest Pacific Railroad Bike Path in
Larkspur. Tidewater Bikeway in Manteca.
9. Control and removal of outdoor advertising.
This includes the control and removal
of existing nonconforming outdoor advertising signs,
billboards, displays, and devices, which are in addition
to removal of illegal signs required to exercise effective
control of outdoor advertising under Section 131 of
Title 23. "Nonconforming" is defined in the
California Administrative Code, Title 4 Chapter 6. In
general, a nonconforming sign was placed lawfully, but
does not conform to subsequent enacted laws. Priority
shall be given to the removal of outdoor advertising
signs, displays, and devices in conjunction with other
enhancement activities, and nonconforming displays along
scenic highways. This category may include compilation
of an accurate inventory of nonconforming outdoor advertising
displays.
If displays are conforming, the agency
with jurisdiction must have effective controls in place,
such as an ordinance or other mechanism, to preclude
replacement displays in the same transportation corridor.
Example of Projects: Purchase and removal
of nonconforming billboards on designated scenic highways.
Purchase of scenic easements along transportation corridors
or viewsheds to prevent visual degradation.
10. Archaeological planning and research.
This includes, but is not limited to,
research on sites qualified for transportation enhancement
funds; experimental activities in archaeological site
preservation and interpretation; planning to improve
identification, evaluation and treatment of archaeological
sites; problem-oriented synthesis using data derived
from (though not limited to) transportation-related
archaeological activities; local and regional research
designs to guide future surveys, data recovery, and
synthetic research; and activities having similar purposes
carried out in partnership with other federal, state,
local and tribal government agencies and non-governmental
organizations.
This category includes rehabilitating
archaeological dig records and curation of artifacts
previously recovered along the transportation corridor
to enhance significance and public appreciation for
the site through interpretative signs, displays, and
publications.
Projects primarily for data entry into
geographic information systems to accommodate future
normal transportation projects are not eligible.
All work must be done in compliance
with the Secretary of the Interior's Standards and Guidelines
for Archeology and Historic Preservation or Secretary
of the Interior's Standards for Historic Preservation
Projects and must be managed under the direction of
professionals meeting the standards published in the
Code of Federal Regulations, 36 CFR, Part 61. The qualifications
define minimum education and experience required to
perform eligible historic preservation activities. In
some cases, additional areas or levels of expertise
may be needed depending on the complexity of the task
and the nature
of the historic properties involved.
In some circumstances, the cultural
and sacred values of Native American or other ethnic
community sites may require the inclusion of additional
viewpoints. Proposals referring to such sites must be
accompanied by evidence that appropriate Native American
and ethnic community representatives have been consulted.
This category is not for excavations.
Example of Projects: Regional or statewide
research. Upgrade or expansion of regional curation
facilities to meet federal and state guidelines, in
order to regionalize archaeological collections and
facilitate regional archaeological research. Statewide
or regional archaeological study for State Routes in
archaeologically sensitive areas, developing an Archaeological
Inventory similar to the existing Bridge Inventory.
Rehabilitation of archaeological dig records and artifacts
previously recovered along a highway to enhance significance
and public appreciation for the site through interpretive
signs
and publications. Construction of traveling displays
of artifacts for schools.
11. Mitigation of water pollution due to highway runoff
or reduce vehicle-caused wildlife mortality while maintaining
habitat connectivity
These projects are for facilities and
programs reducing or eliminating pollution from storm
water runoff from highway facilities in addition to
current requirements and procedures for such mitigation.
The pollution must be due to materials washing off of
the roadway surface. Projects that demonstrate aesthetic
and ecological methods for mitigation and enhance recharge
are encouraged.
Projects may have groundwater recharge,
multiple resource benefits, and aesthetic preservation
components, but only when secondary to the purpose of
mitigating water pollution due to highway runoff.
No activity that has been identified
as a requirement of a stormwater permit is eligible
for enhancement funding.
Acquisition of land in and of itself
is not considered an eligible mitigation of water pollution
unless the acquisition itself fulfills the mitigation
objective. Projects to acquire degraded land to rehabilitate
into mitigation for highway runoff must have absolute
commitments of funds and completed plans for the mitigation
work prior to application.
This category is not limited to threatened
and endangered species, but includes any wildlife mortality
directly caused by vehicles. Fish passage is not eligible.
Projects to reduce wildlife mortality
on new highway construction are not eligible.
If non-motorized human use will be
one result of the project to reduce wildlife mortality,
this does not exclude the activity from consideration
under this program.
Example of Projects: Water pollution
control alongside an existing highway to protect or
improve a drinking water supply. Storm drain stenciling
projects. Santa Monica stormwater treatment facility
enhancements. Wildlife underpasses or overpasses, measures
at areas identified as crossings for wildlife, which
include the necessary fencing and other markings and
techniques associated with movement or wildlife across
transportation corridors. Bridge extensions to provide
or improve wildlife passage and wildlife habitat connectivity.
Monitoring and data collection on habitat fragmentation
and vehicle-related wildlife mortality.
12. Establishment of transportation museums
Transportation museums must meet the
following definition of a museum. The facility must:
a) be a legally organized not-for profit institution
or part of a not-for-profit institution or government
entity;
b) be essentially educational in nature;
c) have a formally stated mission;
d) have one full-time paid professional staff member
who has museum knowledge and experience and is delegated
authority and allocated financial resources sufficient
to operate the museum effectively;
e) present regularly scheduled programs and exhibits
that use and interpret objects for the public according
to accepted standards;
f) have a formal and appropriate program of documentation,
care, and use of collections and/or tangible objects;
and
g) have a formal and appropriate program of presentations
and maintenance of exhibits.
Establishment of transportation museums
means funding of capital improvements. Funds are not
intended to reconstruct, refurbish, or rehabilitate
existing museums, nor portions of museums, that are
not for transportation purposes. It does not cover operations
or maintenance of the facility. The museum must be related
to surface transportation. Establishment of transportation
museums includes the costs of the structure and the
purchase of artifacts necessary for the creation and
operation of the facility. Displays, segments of buildings,
or objects not directly related to transportation are
not eligible. Funds may be used to build a new facility,
add on a transportation wing to an existing facility,
or convert an existing building for use as a transportation
museum.
The museum must be open to the public
and run by a public, non-profit or not-for-profit organization
meeting the definition of museums stated above in this
section. If entrance fees are charged for the museum,
a portion of the fee should be provided for the long-
term maintenance and operation of the facility.
TEA funds may not be used to preserve
aircraft or create an airport or air museum. Objects
or structures related to aviation are not eligible.
All Categories/All Projects
In addition, the project must fit into
the general federal requirements. These are listed in
the "Screening Criteria".
Eligible
Costs
Eligible Costs
The applicant must prepare an accurate
cost estimate for proposed transportation enhancement
activities. Agencies unfamiliar with the kinds of costs
incurred on Title 23 federal-aid projects that are eligible
for reimbursement should refer to the Local Assistance
Procedures Manual and must confer with their Caltrans
District prior to the application deadline.
Transportation enhancement activities
funds are reimbursable federal-aid moneys, subject to
all the requirements of Title 23, United States Code.
They are for capital improvements. Feasibility study
projects are ineligible, which of themselves provide
no enhancement to the public. If a study shows the project
to be feasible and a financial plan shows a credible
source of operating funds, capital phases may be eligible
for enhancement funds. These include preliminary engineering
(including environmental studies), real property acquisition,
and construction costs associated with conducting an
eligible activity. These funds are not to be used for
program planning; however, they may be used for bicycle
and pedestrian safety activities and archaeological
planning projects.
Improvements to private property and
commercial facilities are not eligible, but may include
properties for public use, owned by a public not-for-profit
corporation.
Many projects are a mix of elements,
some on the list of 12 categories and some not. Those
project elements which are on the list may be counted
as transportation enhancement activities. For example,
a rest area might include an adjacent historic site
purchased and developed as an interpretive site illustrating
local history. The historic site purchase and development
qualifies as a transportation enhancement activity.
Activities which are not explicitly
on the list might qualify if they are an integral part
of a larger qualifying activity. For example, if the
rehabilitation of a historic railroad station required
the construction of new drainage facilities, the entire
project could be considered a transportation enhancement
activity. Similarly, environmental analysis, project
planning, design, land acquisition, and construction
activities necessary for implementing qualifying transportation
enhancement activities are eligible for funding. For
example, costs for environmental mitigation required
for the enhancement project itself are reimbursable.
Transportation enhancement activities
may not in themselves be routine or customary elements
of transportation projects or mitigation for project
impacts in compliance with the requirements of environmental,
or other federal, state, or local laws, even if those
aspects will otherwise constitute a specified transportation
enhancement.
Project funding under the transportation
enhancement program is not available for a non-applicant
agency to perform its normal required review and permit
functions.
Convict labor is not a reimbursable
cost.
Costs involved in applying for funds
are not eligible. Any costs incurred prior to written
approval to proceed by Caltrans are not eligible.
+ Transportation Enhancement
Activities are reimbursable projects. Applicants
are expected to finance the project as it proceeds.
+ A match of approximately 12
match dollars to each 88 federal dollars for a total
of 100 dollars is required in each enhancement project
phase. Match may be local dollars, state dollars
[including Environmental Enhancement and Mitigation
program], non-transportation federal dollars, or
private cash.
+ Up to 88 percent of the actual
eligible expenditures up to the ceiling of
the federal funding share will be reimbursed
with each invoice.
+ Administering agencies may
"overmatch" enhancement projects; that
is, additional match dollars may be used in the
transportation enhancement activity beyond the match
requirement.
+ Because of federal policies
and the possibility of cost overruns, administering
agencies are encouraged to use the full extent of
federal funds in the project. Agencies are discouraged
from including more than 49 percent non-federal
dollars in the total enhancement project cost.
+ Administering agencies must
commit to cover any cost overruns if project turns
out to be underfunded.
+ Any work not eligible for
federal TEA reimbursement must be funded by other
means by the project applicant, and cannot count
as match.
Match may be provided from Caltrans
State Highway Account funds for functional transportation
projects and projects on the State Highway right of
way. State Highway Account match may only be requested
during the application process; it may not be requested
after a project is programmed. For a project to receive
State Highway Account funds, the project must be consistent
with Article XIX of the State Constitution.
Section 323 of Title 23 allows right
of way donations to count towards the local funding
share of a project. Donations may be from private ownership
to public ownership, or may be a contribution of public
land for project purposes. Acquired right of way is
not eligible as the match.
"Soft match" refers to instances
where the value of activities accomplished away from
the project are credited toward the non-federal share
(match) of the project. An example of this is the
toll credit provisions of Section 1044 of the ISTEA.
Soft match generally is not eligible under current federal
rules.
When Eligible
Costs Can Be Incurred/Authorization to Proceed
Each project has three possible phases:
preliminary engineering, right of way [acquisition],
and construction. An administering agency may proceed
to incur reimbursable costs for a given phase only after
it receives "Authorization to Proceed" from
the Caltrans District Local Assistance Engineer. This
occurs after:
1) Federal approval of the
project in the FSTIP (Federal State Transportation
Improvement Program), and
2) Submittal of "Request
for Authorization" by administering agency
and execution by Caltrans of the Authorization to
Proceed.
Even though the project may proceed
to incur costs, it may not be reimbursed until the agreements
between Caltrans and the administering agency, and Caltrans
and Federal Highway Administration are executed.
Preliminary
Engineering What is included/ what is excluded
<
The preliminary engineering phase includes
preparation of environmental documentation and preparation
of construction documents (plans, specifications and
cost estimates). Preliminary right of way work to provide
data for environmental documentation may also be reimbursed
from preliminary engineering phase moneys. See the Local
Assistance Procedures Manual.
No costs beyond project-related costs
are eligible. To be eligible for reimbursement, all
project support costs, such as preliminary engineering,
must be included in the programmed project cost. Costs
can be shifted between phases. Mitigation costs, which
arise in the course of the project, are covered up to
the limit of the project cost programmed.
The administering agency may use its
own workforce to do preliminary engineering work. Costs
must be specifically and only for the project. It may
also retain consultants after satisfying federal and
state requirements for selecting consultants.
Proposed projects must obtain federal
environmental clearance under the National Environmental
Policy Act (NEPA) and other federal regulations. This
process can be more costly and take longer than state
clearance under the California Environmental Quality
Act (CEQA). Projects utilizing state funds for match
must comply with requirements of both NEPA and CEQA.
When reimbursement is requested for
preliminary engineering, the administering agency is
obligated to begin construction within ten years of
the Authorization to Proceed. Regardless of the source
of funds used to construct, federal funds used for preliminary
engineering must be returned if construction does not
start within ten years.
Right of
Way (Acquisition) What is included/ What is excluded?
Generally, the right of way phase is
included when: utilities will be relocated; a purchase,
easement, or lease is involved; an operating railroad
facilities will be crossed or modified; an occupant
or business will be relocated; or an access issue is
involved. Refer to the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
Environmental analysis and public hearing
requirements must be completed before starting most
right of way activities. Acquisition projects often
require special environmental studies, even when no
development will occur on the site. For example, these
might include archaeological resources or endangered
species database searches.
When federal funds are to be used for
reimbursement of right of way costs, federal authorization
to begin work must be obtained in advance. All right
of way activities must be performed in accordance with
the federal Uniform Relocation Assistance and Real Property
Acquisition Policies Act as amended, and in conformance
with Caltrans Right of Way procedures for local federal-aid
projects. Funds may be used for costs such as appraisals,
surveys, legal matters, purchase, relocation assistance,
or utilities relocation.
Federal funds may be used only for
costs incurred after Caltrans approves the authorization
to proceed (FNM76).
An offer to acquire property must be
written and may be made only after appraisals are approved.
Commencement of negotiations with property owners prior
to Authorization to Proceed for right of way may jeopardize
reimbursement eligibility.
Obtaining an option to purchase property
is not considered to be an offer to purchase. Therefore,
the requirement that no offer be made until after receiving
environmental clearance and project approval will not
be violated by obtaining an option.
Obtaining an appraisal at an early
stage, for the purpose of estimating the capital cost
of a project, will not bar Federal Highway Administration
participation in project costs. Such an appraisal generally
serves the same functions as the project estimates Caltrans
prepares, providing cost projections used in planning,
applying for funding, etc.
+ However, FHWA will not participate
in the cost of an appraisal prepared prior to Authorization
to Proceed.
+ Any appraisal used as the
basis for an offer must be current. This means that
if the original appraisal used for estimating purposes
is so old as to be suspect as to its timeliness,
it must be reviewed to determine if it is still
current and if not, a new or revised appraisal must
be obtained.
Private, not-for-profit organizations
are not barred from receiving reimbursement of transportation
enhancement activities funds for the purpose of acquiring
real property rights. In addition, private not-for-profit
organizations may take title to real property purchased
with transportation enhancement activities funds, providing
binding language in an appropriate document: a) requires
continued use of the property as was proposed in the
approved application; and b) provides for appropriate
reversion of the property or repayment of public funds
in the event that such use ceases.
Property purchased with transportation
enhancement activities funds may be vested in an agency
of the federal government to accomplish the purpose
of the project, and this will not bar FHWA participation.
Situations where real property rights
are purchased by a private not-for-profit agency first
and then re-sold to a public agency with transportation
enhancement activities reimbursement do not automatically
disqualify the transactions from FHWA participation.
There should be some assurance in these cases that the
serial transaction format was not undertaken in collusion
between the two agencies to circumvent the requirements
of the Uniform Act. Short of evidence of collusion or
circumvention these transactions will not be barred
from FHWA participation.
In the event that the private, not-for-profit
agency:
a) Purchased the property
rights prior to the award of enhancement funds,
and
b) Seems to be making a
financial gain on the property or has been using
the property for some period of time in the
same use as is proposed in the transportation
enhancement activities application,
the facts should be reviewed as early
as possible with the Caltrans District Local Assistance
Engineer and Right of Way Local Assistance Coordinator.
Situations where there is a coordinated
plan for more than one agency to acquire substantially
all of the properties contained in an area should be
reviewed as early as possible with the Caltrans District
Local Assistance Engineer and Right of Way Local Assistance
Coordinator.
If the proposed project is for a scenic
viewshed or other type of land preservation purpose,
the issue of possible dollar savings should be investigated.
Sometimes the proposed project can be satisfactorily
carried out if a scenic easement is acquired rather
than full fee title. The amount of cost savings should
be justified. For example, the continuation of livestock
grazing land use may be compatible with the preservation
of a scenic viewshed. Thus acquiring development rights
from the property owner in the form of restrictive easement
deed clauses, while allowing the owner to retain ownership
rights with permitted continuation of the existing limited
agricultural usage is a proper application of the scenic
easement concept.
When development will occur in the
project, starting the right of way phase obligates the
agency to begin construction within ten years of the
federal approval date.
The construction phase includes advertising
the project, awarding the contract and performing construction.
See the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
The local agency shall inspect project
work to ensure compliance with the contract, and must
provide a Resident Engineer who is a full-time public
employee. A consultant on retainer as City or County
Engineer is considered to be a full-time public employee.
Involving other organizations in the
construction does not absolve administering agencies
from complying with federal regulations such as for
sole source contracts, prevailing wage, or disadvantaged
business enterprise, as described in the Local Assistance
Procedures Manual.
For construction, the contractor is
to be chosen through a competitive bidding process.
Otherwise, the administrating agency must justify using
its own workforce or doing the work by "sole source".
A comparison must be made between:
a) doing work by the agencys own forces [or sole-sourcing
the work to the partner], and b) by contracting out.
Section 108 (h) and Section 109 (h)
of Title 23 encourages states to use youth conservation
or service corps to enter into contracts and cooperative
agreements to perform "appropriate transportation
enhancement projects" as well as the "construction
and maintenance of recreational trails." California
Conservation Corps districts and Local Certified Conservation
Corps are located throughout the state and applicants
are encouraged to use them for construction work that
does not require heavy equipment. This might include
clearing and grubbing, planting and irrigation, and
building rock walls.
Local projects compete for funding
at the regional level (Regional Transportation Planning
Agency). Selected projects are programmed into the Local
Assistance budget, and subsequently approved by Federal
Highway Administration and Federal Transit Administration
in the Federal State Transportation Improvement Program
(FSTIP). The California State Legislature approves the
local assistance budget annually, and the overall funding
but not the project-by-project funding
is allocated by the California Transportation Commission
for administration at the project level by Caltrans.
Regional Transportation Planning Agencies
must have Caltrans check all projects for eligibility,
preferably, before they are programmed into the Transportation
Improvement Program.
All of the screening requirements must
be met, where applicable. If a proposal meets all of
the applicable criteria, it is eligible for consideration;
if not, it will be dropped at this point. The screening
requirements fall into seven groups:
1. Transportation Enhancement
(does it meet the three primary requirements?)
2. Consistency with land use
and transportation plans
3. Financial viability of the
agency and the project
4. Project specific requirements
- well-defined scope and schedule
5. Air Quality - no significant
unmitigatible impacts
6. Americans with Disabilities
Act (ADA) consistency, and
7. Secretary of the Interiors
Standards and guidelines for Archeology and Historic
Preservation and Secretary of the Interiors
Standards for Treatment of Historic Properties.
Each Regional Transportation Planning
Agency programs TEA projects into the Regional Transportation
Improvement Program (RTIP). The RTIP projects are then
approved by the Federal Highway Administration and the
Federal Transit Administration in the Federal State
Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP).
The Administering Agency implements
the transportation enhancement activity project after
the date it is approved for inclusion in the Federal
State Transportation Improvement Program (FSTIP).
The following procedures are a very
brief overview of the procedures described in the Caltrans
Local Assistance Procedures Manual, available on the
internet at www.dot.ca.gov/hq/LocalPrograms/public.htm.
It is imperative for applicants to be familiar
with these procedures and to be prepared to initiate
and complete each project phase in accordance with federal
and state laws and regulations, as extensive Caltrans
oversight is not available. References are made in the
following text to the Manual.
Administration agencies must receive
Authorization to Proceed before reimbursable work can
begin in each phase (Chapter 3, "Project Authorization").
Enhancement projects have up to three phases; not all
projects include all phases:
1. Preliminary engineering,
2) Right of way [acquisition],
and
3) Construction
The administering agency has one primary
contact at Caltrans, a Local Assistance Engineer at
the district where the project resides.
Briefly, the administering agency follows
the Local Assistance Procedures Manual and works with
the Local Assistance Engineer to fulfill these responsibilities:
+ Complete field review form,
Chapter 7 "Field Review"
+ Execute agreements with Caltrans,
Chapter 4 "Agreement"
+ Comply with all applicable
federal, state, and local laws, rules and regulations,
including environmental requirements in executing
the project, Chapter 6 "Environmental Procedures",
and
+ Submit final reconciliation
invoice and report (Chapter 17 "Project Completion"
TEA projects must meet the requirements
of the California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) and
the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) and all
other relevant federal environmental requirements. The
District Local Assistance Engineer will coordinate the
administering agencys early and ongoing contact
with the Caltrans District Environmental Branch. The
administering agency should complete the Preliminary
Environmental Study form prior to contacting the Local
Assistance Engineer about environmental documentation
(Chapter 6, "Environmental Procedures").
The administering agency must comply
with NEPA and other federal environmental requirements
for all federal-aid projects. The other requirements
include:
+ Each enhancement project must
be evaluated to determine if Section 4(f) applies.
Specific documentation and procedural requirements
involving FHWA and other federal agencies must be
followed. Section 4(f) of the Department of Transportation
Act of 1966 applies when a proposed project will
result in the use of land in a publicly owned park,
recreation area, or wildlife and waterfowl refuge,
or any significant historic site. Such a use may
not occur unless there is adequate documentation
that there is no prudent and feasible alternative
to the use of the land in the property, and the
action includes all possible planning to minimize
harm to the property resulting from such use.
+ The administering agency will
be responsible for assessing the potential for impact.
Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act of 1973
requires federal agencies to consult with the U.S.
Fish and Wildlife Service (National Marine Fisheries
Service, if applicable) if a federally-funded project
may affect a listed endangered species or critical
habitat of an endangered species.
+ The administering agency will
be responsible for preparing any documentation necessary
to fulfill these requirements. Section 106 of the
National Historic Act of 1966 provides authority
for the protection of historic and cultural properties.
Section 106 requires federal agencies to take into
account the effects of any federally-funded project
on National Register listed or eligible properties
and consult with the State Historic Preservation
Officer and the Advisory Council on Historic Preservation
as appropriate pursuant to Title 36 Code of Federal
Regulations 800. The "106" process can
be completed in two months to two years or more,
depending on the type of project, impact on the
historic property and mitigation measures required
to protect the historic property.
+ The administering agency is
required to delineate wetlands, identify impacts
and evaluate avoidance alternatives in the environmental
phase of project development. Executive Order 11990,
"Protection of Wetlands", May 24, 1977
requires federal agencies to make a wetlands finding
which determines whether or not there is a practicable
alternative to construction located in wetlands,
whether all practicable measures to minimize harm
to the wetlands have been included in the federal
action, taking into account all economic, environmental,
and other pertinent factors that have a bearing
on practicability. The administering agency is required
to obtain a 404 permit prior to advertisement for
construction. This law and the Section 404 permit
program of the Clean Water Act of 1977 play an important
part in the preliminary engineering phase. Timing
of the field review should be arranged usually in
late winter, spring, or early summer to identify
wetlands plant species.
+ If a project encroaches into
the floodplain, the administering agency is responsible
for all studies necessary to support a finding,
if necessary. Executive Order 11991, Floodplain
Management, May 24, 1977 applies to projects in
the floodplain. It requires that FHWA make a "Only
Practicable Alternative Finding" if a federally
funded project will encroach upon the base (100-year)
floodplain.
+ The administering agency will
be required to prepare any other studies necessary
to comply with any other federal statutes or executive
orders commensurate with the anticipated impacts
of the project.
Required mitigation and permits will
be incorporated into the final construction documents
(plans, specifications and estimate). See
Chapter 6 "Environmental Procedures".
Instructions for preparing project
construction documents are contained in Chapter 12 "Plans,
Specifications and Estimates" in the Caltrans Local
Assistance Procedures Manual.
As a minimum, transportation enhancement
activities will use American Association of State Highway
and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards where
applicable, Caltrans standards for bikeways or when
an encroachment permit is required on a Caltrans facility,
and the California Uniform Building Code whenever it
applies. The Caltrans Highway Design Manual, which contains
bikeway design standards, is available on the internet
at www.dot.ca.gov/hq/oppd/hdm/hdmtoc.htm.
The administering agency should contact
Caltrans District Local Assistance prior to any right
of way activities. Violation of right of way provisions
can jeopardize federal funds for acquisition and construction.
Whenever federal funds will be used
in any phase of the project, the acquisition of real
property is subject to the provisions of the Uniform
Relocation Assistance and Real Property Acquisition
Policies Act of 1970 as amended, no matter if carried
out by private parties or by federal, state or local
agencies.
When the acquisition of real property
qualifies for the voluntary sale provisions of the Act,
no relocation assistance payments are to be provided
to the grantor(s) being displaced from the property
because of the project.
Tenants being displaced because of
the project are entitled to all relocation assistance
benefits under the Act. Grantor(s) being displaced from
the property due to the project are entitled to all
relocation assistance benefits under the Act, when the
acquisition does not meet the requirements for a voluntary
sale.
Administering agencies should allow
three weeks for acquisition checks to be put into escrow.
The program supplemental agreement must give Caltrans
the authority to pay into escrow, and indicate to whom
the check should be made payable.
The construction phase steps generally
include:
+ Authorization to Proceed, Chapter
15 "Advertise and Award Project"
+ Project advertising, Chapter 15
"Advertise and Award Project"
+ Bid opening, Chapter 15 "Advertise
and Award Project"
+ Award, Chapter 15 "Advertise
and Award Project"
+ Daily reporting, Chapter 16 "Administer
Construction Contracts"
+ Labor compliance, Chapter 16 "Administer
Construction Contracts"
+ Contract change orders, Chapter
16 "Administer Construction Contracts", and
+ Project completion and final invoicing,
Chapter 17 "Project Completion".
Before funds can be reimbursed, the
administering agency and Caltrans sign a master agreement
and program supplemental agreement. The master agreement
is a "blanket agreement" under which program
supplemental agreements are executed specifically for
each project. See Chapter 4 "Agreements" in
the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
The agreements are to ensure compliance
with federal and state requirements. The master agreement
includes the mechanisms whereby the administering agency
refunds federal moneys to the state, should the agency
and its consultants and contractors not be in compliance
with these federal regulations and maintenance provisions.
The federal cost programmed into the
Local Assistance budget is a fixed amount. In general,
cost increases must be covered with local funds.
Project cost changes can be expected
due to environmental or design decisions, from contractors
bidding, or during construction.
If project costs exceed the amount
programmed, the administering agency has at least one
of the following options:
+ Fund the additional cost with
available local resources,
+ Change the scope of the project
to fit within the funding programmed (subject to
the Federal Highway Administration, Regional Transportation
Planning Agency and/or Commission and Caltrans approval),
+ Fund the additional cost in
one project phase with identified savings from another
project phase,
+ Re-advertise the project for
new contractor bids,
+ Request additional funding
from the Regional Transportation Planning Agency,
or
+ Drop the project as no longer
cost effective.
Caltrans approves minor changes in
project scope or shift of funding between project phases.
The Regional Transportation Planning also must approve
any additional federal or state funding or substantive
change in project scope.
The Commission, Caltrans and the Regional
Transportation Planning Agencies encourage cost savings
on projects to conserve funding so that more future
projects can be funded in the program. Savings are retained
in the Region in which they occur.
The State may perform financial and
compliance audits on administering agencies expenditures.
See Chapter 5 "Accounting/Invoices" in the
Local Assistance Procedures Manual. Audits can establish
that dollars must be paid back by the administering
agency.
Audits are also performed on nonprofit
institutions receiving federal funds from an administering
agency. Consultants must agree to give access and assistance
to state and federal auditors.
For reimbursement, the administering
agency submits monthly progress payment invoices for
work completed on its letterhead to Caltrans Headquarters
Local Assistance. As an option, the agency may wait
and request full payment with a Final Invoice upon notification
of project completion. See Chapter 5 "Accounting/Invoices"
in the Local Assistance Procedures Manual.
Administering agencies are encouraged
to have ribbon-cutting ceremonies with public officials
in attendance, to acknowledge funding sources and promote
the community benefits of the transportation enhancement
project. For more information, contact Howard Reynolds,
Caltrans TEA, at 916-654-2477.
Administering agencies are generally
responsible for maintaining projects into the future.
The agency pays for the maintenance effort unless subsequent
agreement specifies otherwise. Maintenance costs are
not eligible for enhancement funding.
Failure of an administering agency
to maintain a project can result in Caltrans withholding
approval for other federal-aid projects until the project
is put back in proper condition.
If you have questions or are
experiencing problems downloading, you can get help
from Tech
Support, or E-mail us at:
Local.Programs@dot.ca.gov
|