| CONTRACT NO: | 11-064904 |
| ROUTE / KP | 11-SD-15-R10.3/R12.1 |
| LOCATION | In San Diego In San Diego From 0.5 KM North Of Route 15/8 Separation To 1.1 KM North Of Friars Road Overcrossing. |
| DESCRIPTION | Add Auxiliary Lane And Modify Connector Ramp (SB). |
| ESTIMATE | $ 7,680,000.00 |
| THREE WEEK ADVERTISEMENT
PERIOD- NO DELAY.
18 % DBVE GOAL |
|
| ADVERTISE DATE | 06/02/03 |
| BID OPENING | 06/26/03 |
| FINAL POSTING | 06/26/03 @ 10:15 |
|
|
FCI CONSTRUCTORS INC. | $ 5,889,230.50 |
|
|
ERRICA'S/HANSON SJH | $ 6,656,507.00 |
|
|
COFFMAN SPECIALTIES INC. | $ 6,885,608.00 |
The Caltrans District 11
Office is located at 2829 Juan Street, San Diego, CA 92110. The mailing
address is P.O. Box 85406, San Diego, CA 92186-5406. The District 11 Duty
Senior telephone number is (619) 688-6635. Please submit all inquiries
in the proper format by fax to (619) 688-6988 or e-mail to:
Duty_Senior_Const_District11@dot.ca.gov.
The responses to
bidder' inquiries, unless incorporated into a formal addenda to the contract,
are not a part of the contract and are provided for the bidder's convenience
only. In some instances, the question and answer may represent a summary
of the matters discussed rather than a word-for-word recitation. The responses
may be considered along with all other information furnished to prospective
bidders for the purpose of bidding on the project. The availability or
use of information provided in the responses to bidder' inquiries is not
to be construed in any way as a waiver of the provisions of Section 2-1.03
of the Standard Specifications or any other provision of the contract,
the plans, Standard Specifications or Special Provisions, nor to excuse
the contractor from full compliance with those contract requirements. Bidders
are cautioned that subsequent responses or contract addenda may affect
or vary a response previously given.
Caltrans District 11 Construction Department
has developed this method of answering Bidder's Inquiries to better serve
the needs of the Contractors who bid on our Projects. Caltrans District
11 Construction Department will post all of the questions submitted by
any of the contractors that are registered Planholders for that Contract,
but reserves the right to not answer any questions deemed unsatisfactory
for public viewing.
The BIDDER'S INQUIRIES
& RESPONSES will be updated continuously and all attempts will be made
to do the final posting by 15:00 on Wednesday prior to the bid opening.
INFORMATION
AVAILABLE
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
BIDDER'S
INQUIRY SUBMITTAL FORM
|
|
Inquiry |
|
Q:05/30/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=NOTICE TO CONTRACTORS
When will the cross sections be available and where?
5560 Ruffin Road Suite 5 San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 541-1500 FAX (858) 278-0558 e-mail to plot@mesablueprint.com San Diego, CA 92123 |
|
Q:06/04/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
Why were the structural sections not shown on the layout sheets? It's virtually impossible to do the take off without these limits being shown.
|
|
Q:06/09/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
Please provide some elevations in order
for us to be able to calculate the
Bent 3......Sta 122+15.709 +/-.......Elev @ "SE" line = 30.749 +/- |
|
Q:06/13/03 R:06/18/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=74 & 75, 2.1 m Permanent Steel Casing &
2.1 m CIDH Concrete Piling. What is the cutoff elevation of Bent 2 and 3 piling.
|
|
Q:06/16/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=.
As was stated at an earlier date. We are unable to complete our take off work on the bridge widening for the Northeast Connector due to the lack of deck elevations being shown on the drawings. We are also requesting that a one week postponement be granted to allow us time to finish our take off and complete pricing work on the bridge portion.
|
|
Q:06/16/03 R:06/18/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
Bridge Drawings do not provide for cut off elevations for the 1830 mm CIDH. Please provide this information.
Sheet 188/212, DEMOLITION PLAN. |
|
Q:06/17/03 R:06/18/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=75 2.1 m CIDH Concrete Piling, sheet192 of 212.
Will a construction joint be allowed
within the piling at the base
|
|
Q:06/18/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
Please provide the cut-off-elevations for the 2.1 M CIDH Pile at Bents 2 & 3.
|
|
Q:06/19/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=75, 2.1 m CIDH Concrete Piling, sheets
192 and 194 of 212. In Response to Question 4, what elevation
should be used at Bents 2
|
|
Q:06/19/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=75 2.1 m CIDH Concrete Piling.
The response to Question 7 states that
no construction joint will
|
|
Q:06/23/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
Sheets R-1 thru R-4 call for specified locations of the expansion joints and weakened plane joints. The locations do not agree with the locations shown on sheets R-5 thru R-6. Which set is correct.
|
|
Q:06/23/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
The same applies for sheets R-7& R-8 and R-9.
|
|
Q:06/23/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
The limits for the cobble stone finish does not show the vertical limits. Please give that dimension.
|
|
Q:06/23/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
The quantity for anti-graffiti does not match the quantity for cobblestone. The specification states that only the stained cobblestone shall receive the coating. Is there additional area not specified that will receive the coating?
|
|
Q:06/23/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
Does the overhead sign foundation located at station 120+30.769 "RW - 3" receive a cobble stone finish?
|
|
Q:06/24/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
Traffic charts for I 15 do not allow a full closure. The specification require no work over live traffic. What do the specifications allow for the removal of sign structure 3 and the installation of sign structure 4 & 7?
|
|
Q:06/24/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=
There are no charts for shoulder closures. What times are we allowed to close shoulders?
|
|
Q:06/24/03 |
Plan Sheet /
Specification Reference=193031 PERVIOUS BACKFILL MATERIAL (RETAINING WALL)
There is nothing in the specifications that show that we can use geodrain in place of pervious backfill. Are we allowed to use geodrain in place of the pervious backfill.
|