|
The
statewide transportation planning process and metropolitan planning process
produce long-range intermodal statewide transportation plans and short-range
programs of projects. The decision-making effort for these processes is
open for input from a variety of participants. The short-range program
of projects must include at least all projects proposed to be funded by
the FHWA or the FTA.
Long-range plans frame the State’s long-range transportation
goals and objectives for the State (i.e., “California Transportation
Plan”) and or region. Projects should be identified and programmed on
the State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), the State Highway
Operations Protection Program (SHOPP), the California Transportation
Plan (CTP), the Interregional Transportation Strategic Plan (ITSP),
the District System Management Plans (DSMP) and Regional Transportation
Plans (RTP) and ultimately implemented. The projects implemented from
the STIP should be consistent with the goals and objectives identified
in the long-range plan. The STIP projects are developed in a multi-year
cycle.
It is important for the Department and the transportation
planning agencies to provide opportunity for active involvement of Tribal
Governments, minority, low-income, elderly and disabled populations
in statewide and metropolitan transportation planning and programming.
It is important to recognize and be sensitive to tribal customs and
to the nationally recognized sovereignty of Tribal Governments. Tribal
Governments are independent government bodies rather than a minority
group. Refer to the appendix on Native Americans for additional guidance
on working with Native American Communities.
Potential Title VI Issues
Plans and programs have the potential of being discriminatory
in more subtle ways than projects. The major area of impact by plans
and programs is through decisions that identify one or more planned
improvements over other options. This consequence may result from procedures
and processes that unintentionally exclude a group from the process
or from the failure to consider the impacts of various transportation
system alternatives and programs of projects on one or more identified
groups.
To the extent that plans and programs include proposed
improvements with disproportionate beneficial impacts or reflect decision
making processes that exclude certain groups, the long-term agenda for
transportation improvements may be inappropriately biased. This could
lead to project implementation that is inconsistent with nondiscrimination
requirements. The actual impacts may only be experienced as projects
are implemented. The planning process represents a comprehensive perspective
from which transportation agencies assess the potential consequences
of developing and
operating the transportation system. The planning process
should consider, as applicable,: whether:
1. There is effective public involvement/participation
based on the use of Performance Measures and demographic analysis.
2. Input from minority groups/persons is seriously being
considered.
3. There is consultation with Tribal Governments in statewide
and metropolitan transportation planning.
4. Data collection and analysis is sufficient to support
decisions.
5. Social, economic and environmental effects and impacts
have been identified and described.
6. Minorities, women, community based organizations and
Tribal Governments have been provided an opportunity to successfully
compete for planning studies, corridor studies or other work.
7. Title VI requirements have been included in contract
and grant language.
8. When awarding a contract or grant, whether the contractor
or applicant has any unresolved Title VI violations.
9. Alternative languages, other than English, are needed
to effectively communicate with the eligible population.
10. The Program Area Administrator and/or District Title
VI Liaison have reviewed and commented on policies and plans from a
Title VI perspective.
Recommended Good Practices and Mitigation Measures
1. Incorporate Title VI requirements into policies and procedures.
2. Encourage and seek participation from those most directly
impacted.
3. Contact minority community leaders, organizations and
media. Develop a contact database.
4. Conduct adequate number of meetings and hearings.
5. Establish and participate on civic advisory committees.
6. Set appropriate meeting location, time, day of week,
language needs and atmosphere to reach the target group.
7. Demonstrate consideration of community input via newsletters,
letters, leaflets or other printed medium that will potentially reach
the target group/audience.
8. Establish effective relationships with Tribal Governments
and non-federally recognized tribal groups and organizations.
9. Conduct training on American Indian customs and laws
that govern their various sovereign nations.
10. Develop data collection methods designed to obtain the
following information:
· Description of community boundaries,
· Demographic composition, including racial/ethnic makeup,
income levels and age (seniors/youths),
· Tax base,
· Populations with disabilities and
· Community services, schools, hospitals, shopping centers,
public safety.
11. Focus on outreach so that minority, disabled and women-owned
firms have an opportunity to compete for work.
12. When giving presentations at community workshops, put
graphics, slides, etc. in applicable languages. Attempt to include and
describe processes and community interactions in ways that translated
words cannot.
13. Communicate with other transportation entities to determine
what outreach methods are being used and consider alternative methods
to enhance attendance at meetings.
14. In cooperation with other transportation entities, provide
technical assistance.
15. Treat everyone equitably.
16. To ensure opportunity for full participation and accommodation
for persons with disabilities, every meeting or notice of a meeting
should:
a. Be held in a totally accessible facility;
b. Contain a statement on how to request alternative format
documents and assistive services, if you are an individual with a disability
requiring such services;
c. Give consideration to accessible alternatives such as
videos, if captioning is not included on the tape, such as using interpreters;
or a script of the video in Braille for those who are deaf and blind,
for example upon request.
17. Insure that persons with hearing impairments are accommodated
in the most effective manner possible, whether that is via sign language
interpreter, real-time captioning or not using the video if they would
not be able to participate in receipt of the information via that method.
18. Develop glossaries of planning terms in other languages
for limited English proficient purposes.
19. Public service announcements to be closed captioned
as required by Americans with Disabilities Act.
20. Contact minority businesses annually and inform them
of the procurement process.
Possible Compliance Review Questions
Recent regulations on metropolitan and statewide planning
draws attention to overall
strategies and goals, service equity and public involvement.
The questions below are
adapted from the Policy Guidance Concerning Application
of Title VI of the Civil
Rights Act of 1964 to Metropolitan and Statewide Planning,
23CFR Parts 450 and 771
and 49CFR Parts 619 and 622. These questions focus on public
involvement strategies
for minority and low-income populations, assessment of the
distribution of benefits
and adverse environmental impacts at the planning and project
stages. Programs will
be expected to provide a written response to these questions
in advance of the Title
VI Program Compliance Review.
A. Strategies and Goals
1. What strategies and efforts has your planning process
developed for ensuring, demonstrating and substantiating compliance
with Title VI?
2. What measures have been used to verify that the multi-modal
system access and mobility performance improvements, included in the
plan and Transportation Improvement Program (TIP), Regional Transportation
Improvement Program (RTIP), Interregional Improvement Program (ITIP)
and the underlying planning process, comply with Title VI?
3. Has your planning process developed a demographic profile
of the State that includes identification of the locations of socioeconomic
groups, including low-income and minority populations as covered by
the Executive Order on Environmental Justice and Title VI provisions?
Describe how.
4. Does your planning process seek to identify the needs
of low-income and minority populations? Describe how.
5. Does your planning process seek to make use of demographic
information to examine the distributions across these groups of the
benefits and burdens of the transportation investments included in the
plan and TIP?
6. What methods are used to identify imbalances?
B. Service Equity
1. Does your planning process have an analytical process
in place for assessing the regional benefits and burdens of transportation
system investments for different socioeconomic groups?
2. How does the planning process respond to the analysis
produced?
C. Public Involvement
1. Provide a copy of your public involvement process policy.
Is there at least a 45-day public comment period before the process
or revision is adopted?
2. Is information about transportation issues and processes
provided timely to citizens, public agencies, transportation agency
employees, private sector transportation providers and others affected
by transportation plans, programs and projects?
Describe how.
3. Does the public have access to technical and policy information
used to develop plans and the TIP and to public meetings where Federal-aid
highway and transit programs are considered? Describe how.
4. Is advance public notice given, at least 30 days, for
public review and comment on key decisions, including approval of plans,
TIPS and amendments? Describe how.
5. Are explicit considerations and responses offered to
public input received during the planning and program development stages?
Describe how.
6. Are the needs of low-income and minority households taken
into account? Describe how.
7. Does the public outreach effort use media such as print,
television, radio, etc. targeted to low-income or minority populations?
8. Has your program made funds available to local organizations
that represent low-income and minority populations to enable their participation
in the planning process?
9. Are Tribal Governments and related public agencies on
public or tribal land involved in the development of transportation
plans and programs? Describe how Tribal Governments are involved in
the planning process, and what considerations are given to Indian reservation
roads.
10. When significant written or oral comments are received
on the draft transportation plan, financial plan or TIP, as a result
of the public involvement process, is a summary analysis and report
of the disposition of the comments made part of the final plan and TIP?
11. What changes have occurred as a result of input by public
involvement, specifically low-income and minority populations?
12. Is the public involvement process reviewed periodically
to determine the effectiveness of full and open access to all? Describe
how.
13. Is the district public involvement process coordinated
with the statewide public involvement processes wherever possible to
enhance the consideration of public issues, plans and programs and to
reduce redundancies of costs? Describe how.
14. Describe the types of assurances utilized to assure
that no one has been excluded from participation in or denied benefit
of or otherwise subjected to discrimination on the basis of race, color,
sex, national origin or physical handicap for any program receiving
assistance from the USDOT.
15. Describe actions taken to comply with the Americans
with Disabilities Act.
16. Are traffic, ridesharing, transportation safety and
enforcement agencies including the County Transportation Commissions,
commuter rail operators, airport authorities, private sector transportation
providers and city officials involved in your planning?
Describe how.
17. Are local, State and Federal environmental, resource
and permit agencies involved in your planning? Describe how.
18. Have there been any changes in your public involvement
processes since your last review?
If so, what are they?
19. Were there any planning studies undertaken during the
last two years, which specifically addressed the needs of minority and
or low-income populations?
If so, identify.
20. Describe what kinds of demographic data, including race
and income, is collected.
D. Hearings
1. What statistics are kept on public hearing participation by race
and gender?
Visual identification?
2. Are minority group concerns addressed in a timely manner? Describe
how.
3. Are public meeting announcements made available in languages other
than English, according to the affected minority population? Describe how
and provide an example.
4. Are accessible locations (geographically and structurally), appropriate
times and translation services planned for and provided during public hearings?
E. Contracts
1. Does your division/district advertise? Describe the process.
2. How does your program promote the participation of Disadvantaged
Business Enterprises (DBE) contracts?
3. Are DBE goals set and do you meet those goals?
4. Who in the program monitors the contractor’s adherence with the
Title VI requirements?
5. Provide a copy of your approved DBE plan.
6. Provide the number, dollar values and types of contracts and funding
sources used during the last two fiscal years. Identify if there were any
DBEs on the contracts.
Administration
A. Management Staff Composition
1. Provide a staffing composition listing by position, race and gender.
Include an organizational chart.
2. Policy and Advisory Committees – Provide a staffing composition
listing of committees and their respective members by position, race and
gender.
3. Describe, in summary, the programs administered by the Transportation
Planning Program.
B. Complaint Procedure
1. What process do you follow when handling Title VI complaints and
how are your customers made aware of this process?
2. How many Title VI related complaints have you received in the
past two years?
3. What was the outcome of those complaints?
C. Training
1. Has staff received formal or informal training regarding Title
VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and/or Environmental Justice Executive
Orders? Please describe.
2. What is your schedule for Title VI training this year and who
will attend?
D. Status of Title VI Program with the FTA
1. Provide a copy of your most recent FTA Title VI program submission.
What date was it approved and what date does it expire?
2. Did FTA make changes, comments or additions prior to approval?
If so, in what areas?
Self Monitoring
1. What office or section within the planning function has lead
responsibility for Title VI matters?
2. What process has been implemented to ensure Title VI issues
are addressed in the planning process?
3. How do MPOs obtain representation in their membership reflecting
the diversity of the population they serve?
4. How does your program ensure that MPOs solicit and consider
the views of all groups within the population in the planning of highway
projects?
FTA Triennial Reports 23 CFR 450.334, 200.13; 49 CFR 21;
NDA; UMTA Cir.4702.1
The Division of Transportation Planning, Office of Regional and Interagency
Planning administers Federal pass through planning funds. These funds are available
to both MPOs and regional planning agencies. Pursuant to Urban Mass Transportation
Act circular 4702.1, all recipients of planning funds must meet either General
Program Requirements or Emphasis Programs requirements once every three years.
In addition, MPOs within service areas with populations over 200,000 must comply
with both the General and Emphasis Programs requirements. The Office of Regional
and Interagency Planning compiles the responses from the MPOs and regional transportation
planning agencies and submits a report to the FTA with a copy to the Title VI
Coordinator.
The term project development process refers to the process of a highway or
transit project in which the environmental study necessary for the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) compliance is performed. During this process,
data and information on project alternatives and related environmental effects
are collected and analyzed. The goal of this process is to develop a complete
understanding of the existing and future environmental conditions and the possible
effects of a proposed project in order to make the best project decision in
terms of meeting the intended transportation need, the goals of an area or community
and for protection and enhancement of the environment.
The project development process includes environmental, right
of way, construction and research. Narrative discussion on these programs
include: Potential Title VI Issues, Recommended Good Practices and Mitigation
Measures, Possible Compliance Review Questions and Self Monitoring.
|