EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Executive
Summary
Introduction
Current
Operating HOV Facilities in Orange County
Purpose
of the DEIR/EIS
Purpose
and Need for the Project
Project
Alternatives
Project
Impacts/Mitigation
Coordination
with Resource Agencies
PROJECT IMPACTS/MITIGATION
One of the goals of CEQA/NEPA is
to ensure early coordination and consultation with
resource agencies. Depending on the environmental
impacts to a resource, one or several resources agencies
may be con-tacted during the environmental document
phase for consultation to address potential project
impacts to resources. If the resource agency determines
an impact to its resources, the project proponent
may be required to obtain applicable permits. Although
the permit process may not occur until a later phase
in the project, early coordination is required. This
would allow the project proponent and the resources
agency to determine the required permit(s) and methods
to minimize the potential impacts to the re-sources.
During the early phase of the SR-22
WOCC proposed project, Caltrans initiated coordination
with several resources agencies to determine the possible
required permits. The regulatory agencies were contacted
as part of the coordination and consultation efforts:
A. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service
(USFWS): As part of the coordination and consultation
efforts, in June 2000 Caltrans contacted USFWS requesting
information on sensitive/listed species that potentially
occur within the limits of the SR-22/WOCC study area.
B. California Department of Fish
and Game (CDFG): A Section 1601 Streambed/Lake Alteration
Agreement from CDFG may be required if there is diversion
or obstruction in the natural flow or change of the
bed, channel, or bank of any river, stream, or lake,
or use of any material from a streambed, designated
by the Department as an existing fish or wildlife
resource.
C. U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (ACOE):
Caltrans, OCTA, and the SR-22/WOCC consultants have
informally consulted with the Corps regarding permitting
for the various project elements. Spe-cifically, a
draft NEPA/Section 404 Permit Process Determination
Preliminary Information Pack-age was prepared. The
Section 404 Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) process
was not applied because of the anticipated applicability
of a nationwide 404 permit.
D. State Historic Preservation Office
(SHPO): Caltrans has provided the Historic Property
Survey Report, Historic Architectural Survey Report,
and the Negative Archaeological Survey Report to FHWA
for transmittal to the State Historic Preservation
Office (SHPO). The SHPO conclusion on the HPSR and
Determination of Effect Finding of Adverse Effect
(DOE/FOE) documentation are as follows:
· SHPO concurs with FHWA's
determination that the Full Build Alternative, with
its proposed Pacific Electrical Arterial component,
would have an adverse effect on the Pacific Elec-tric/Santa
Ana Bridge (a National Register eligible property)
if selected as the preferred alter-native;
· SHPO concurs that the Reduced
Build Alternative, if selected as the preferred alternative,
would have no effect on historic properties.