| CONTRACT NO: | 11-2T0924 |
| ROUTE / KP | 11-SD-15 ,163 -R16.7/M34.1E16.1/R18.8 |
| LOCATION | In San Diego County In San Diego On Route 15 From 0.3 Km South Of Route 52/15 Separation To 1.0 Km North Of Carmel Mountain Road Overcrossing And On Route 163 From 0.6 Km North Of Route 163/52 Separation To Route 163/15 Separation. |
| DESCRIPTION | To Construct The Managed Lanes - South Segment, Unit 2. |
| ESTIMATE | $ 75,000,000 |
| WORKING
DAYS |
900 |
| ADVERTISE DATE | 04/14/2008 |
| BID OPENING | 06/12/2008 07/10/2008 |
| FINAL POSTING |
07/09/08
@ 1515 |
The Caltrans District
11
Office is located at 4050 Taylor Street, San Diego, CA 92110. The
District 11
Duty
Senior telephone number is (619) 688-6635. Please submit all inquiries
in the proper format by fax to (619) 688-6988 or e-mail to:
Duty_Senior_Const_District11@dot.ca.gov.
The responses to
bidder' inquiries, unless incorporated into a formal addenda to the
contract,
are not a part of the contract and are provided for the bidder's
convenience
only. In some instances, the question and answer may represent a
summary
of the matters discussed rather than a word-for-word recitation. The
responses
may be considered along with all other information furnished to
prospective
bidders for the purpose of bidding on the project. The availability or
use of information provided in the responses to bidder' inquiries is
not
to be construed in any way as a waiver of the provisions of Section
2-1.03
of the Standard Specifications or any other provision of the contract,
the plans, Standard Specifications or Special Provisions, nor to excuse
the contractor from full compliance with those contract requirements.
Bidders
are cautioned that subsequent responses or contract addenda may affect
or vary a response previously given.
Caltrans District 11 Construction
Department
has developed this method of answering Bidder's Inquiries to better
serve
the needs of the Contractors who bid on our Projects. Caltrans District
11 Construction Department will post all of the questions submitted by
any of the contractors that are registered Planholders for that
Contract,
but reserves the right to not answer any questions deemed
unsatisfactory
for public viewing.
The BIDDER'S
INQUIRIES
& RESPONSES will be updated continuously and all attempts will be
made
to do the final posting by 15:00 on Wednesday prior to the bid opening.
INFORMATION
AVAILABLE
| X-SECTIONS 4/25/08 |
|
|
|
|
| ADDITIONAL X-SECTIONS 05/19/08 |
|
Posted 06/27/08 |
BIDDER'S INQUIRY SUBMITTAL FORM
|
|
Inquiry |
|
1
Q:04/17/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Special Provision Section 5-1.17 Project Information
Question=Special Provision
Section 5-1.17 Project Information page 159, states that cross sections
are available in electronic copy. When will the cross sections be
available for download and use.
MESA REPROGRAPHICS 5560 Ruffin Road Suite 5 San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 541-1500 FAX (858) 278-0558 e-mail to plot@mesareprographics.com San Diego, CA 92123 |
|
2
Q:04/30/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference=
Question= Stage Construction
Plans - Stage 5B, Sheets SC-78 and SC-79. There appears to be
missing sheets as the stationing on SC-78 ends @ approx Sta 250 but
starts @ approximately Sta 275 on Sheet SC-79. The quantity
sheets indicate the easterly K-Rail runs continuously through the
missing sheets/stations. Please confirm.
|
|
3
Q:05/06/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Summary of Quantities, Drawing Q-2, Sheet No. 566
Question= The Earthwork
Summary list 19 locations for excavation and embankment volumes. The
provided electronic cross sections on your website covers only 11 of
these locations. Please provide cross sections for the following
locations:
|
|
4
Q:06/04/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= 2-1.02A DVBE GOAL FOR THIS PROJECT (5%)
Question= Does the DVBE goal
of 5% include an incentive? If so, what is the incentive percentage? If
not, what is the reason for not including it?
|
|
5
Q:06/09/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= LIGHTING AND SIGN ILLUMINATION, TEMPORARY LIGHTING
Question= ELECTRICAL PLANS ON
E-65, E-66 DOES NOT SHOW ANY NEW POLES, ONLY TEMPORARY POLES,IS THIS
CORRECT?
|
|
6
Q:06/16/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= 249(S) 860798 Booster Pump Electrical system, 10-3.37
Question= Where does this
system show up on the drawings?
|
|
7
Q:06/19/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Section 10-4.5 Welded Steel Pipe, page 490 Re: Hydrostatic Testing: “While under this pressure, the pipe shall be sharply struck at 150 mm intervals along the weld…..” Question= We strongly urge to
remove this requirement because it will put the life of workers in
jeopardy
|
|
8
Q:06/19/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Section 10-4.5 Welded Steel Pipe, page 490 Re: “Maximum pipe lengths shall be 9 meters unless spreader beams are used in lifting the pipe sections” Question= Are we allowed at
the manufacturing facility to handle the pipes larger than 9 meters
with the forklift?
|
|
9
Q:06/19/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Section 10-4.88 Pipe Preparation, page 504 Re: “Omit cement mortar coat for steel pipe to be installed inside bridge girder” Question= We are asking to
change the bare tapewrap coating with polyurethane paint per AWWA C222
standard.
|
|
10
Q:06/19/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Section 10-4.55 Pipe Preparation, page 491
Question= We do not recommend
field lining of the 400 mm steel pipe.
|
|
11
Q:06/19/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Re: Drawing UD-8 Detail 3 shows welded wire fabric as
reinforcement for cement mortar lining
Question= Please allow spiral
wire as reinforcement for the straight lengths of pipe as allowed on
AWWA C205 paragraph 4.5.5.1.
|
|
12
Q:06/24/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Cement Mortar Thickness for welded steel pipe: Specification
book page 504 & page 501 require 25.4mm and Specification book page
491 and Dwg UD-8 require 32mm
Question= Please clarify the
thickness for Cement Mortar Coating required on the welded steel pipe.
|
|
13
Q:06/26/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= This project was scheduled to bid June 12, 2008.
Addendum #1 was issued May 14, 2008 in which the bid date was postponed
until July 10, 2008 for no apparent reason. Today, we received Addendum #2 with changed specification sheets approximately one inch thick and changed plan sheets about one half inch thick, WITH NO CHANGE IN BID DATE! Question= If you can issue an
addendum on May 14, 2008 giving the Caltrans TWO MONTHS to make any
changes that were desired, how can you issue a major addendum that adds
to, and changes the scope of work and allow the bidding contractors
barely TWO WEEKS to analyze these changes before the bid date?
This is basically a five year job, that
cannot be awarded until the state budget is approved (sometime in
August, we understand) so what is the point in rushing the bidding
preparation process? WE REQUEST A POSTPONEMENT OF THE BID DATE OF
AT LEAST
TWO WEEKS!
|
|
14
Q:06/30/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Item #211
Question= Can the SCI100GM
(Smart Cushion) be used instead of the React 9CBB? Can it be bid as an
equal, or will it be expected as a post bid C.R.I.P. ?
|
|
15
Q:07/01/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= B.I.#109, 1.5M CIDH Conc. Piles @ Carroll CYn. Rd. OC.
Question= Current satging in
conctract documents have very restricted access for work to be
performed in Stage 2A & 2B for Abutment 1 work. What is the
allowable equipment loads that would be acceptable for palcing
equipment on the Carroll Canyon Bridge deck for Abutment #1 work, prior
to the removal of that section of existing bridge?
|
|
16
Q:07/02/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Item 91, HOT MIX ASPHALT, Section 10-1.51, MATERIALS, Third
paragraph.
Question= Section 10-1.51,
Materials, Third paragraph, reads "The aggregate for HMA Type A must
comply with the 12.5 mm grading". Is the 12.5 mm aggregate to be
used for all HMA Asphalt as it reads, or only for the mix to be used
for the dike? Please clarify if this should read 19 mm aggregate
|
|
17
Q:07/02/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Item # 161, 600MM Alternative Pipe Culvert. Plan sheet # 187
& # 226
Question= How does the State
propose the contractor install "element a" of Drainage unit #22 accross
4 lanes of live freeway traffic 2.4 meters deep without diverting
traffic off of the work area for a prescribed amount of time or
specifying some sort of Bore? Please give us some incite into what the
designer may have had in mind for this work. You have designed this
element to be Alt. Pipe. Are you sure you want to allow plastic pipe in
this configuration.
|
|
18
Q:07/03/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Item #68, Structure Backfill (Soldier Pile Wall), Special
Provision Section 10.137(pg279) and plan sheet 865.
Question= Plan sheet 865
exhibits limits of payment for structure backfill (SP Wall) above and
in front of lagging. The specials state that structure backfill
(SP Wall) is behind lagging. Please clarify limits of structure
backfill with respect to lagging. Is drainage behind lagging paid
under item 68, 158 or other (see specials section 10.137 "measurement
and payment")?
|
|
19
Q:07/03/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Sheet X-9 of Addendum 2, SD-15M Line
Question= Sheet X-9 of
Addendum 2 added 45mm cold plane/45mm HMA-A overlay on the 56SON and
SD-15M Lines from Sta 315+40 to 320+25. Please clarify the
following in regards to this added work:
|
|
20
Q:07/07/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= Addenda #2, Page #56 (CHART) REDUCED PAYMENT FACTORS FOR
PERCENT OF MAXIMUM THEORETICAL DENSITY
Question= Could you please
clarify, and or explain, the chart on Page 56 of Addenda #2. It
appears, according to your chart, that the contractor will receive
"Reduced Payment" by achieving maximum in-place asphalt densities
greater than 97%.
|
|
21
Q:07/07/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= 136, Bar Reinforcing Steel (Retaining Wall)
Question= Please clarify what
Bid Item 136 applies to. Does it apply to the shotcrete facing
over the 1.5 M CIDH at Abutment 1 of Carroll Canyon Rd., the initial
shotcrete facing on RW 250L or both?
|
|
22
Q:07/07/08 |
Plan Sheet / Specification
Reference= You did not answer to question # 12 submitted on 06/24/08. The thickness on the drawing UD-8, detail 3 (32mm) conflicts with Specification 10-4.87 (25.4mm) Question= What is the
thickness of cement mortar coating over the tape wrapped pipe?
|