New Multilane Highway And Bridges To Be Constructed.
Advertise
Date 05/22/00
Bids
Open
10/12/00
BID
RESULTS OF 10/12/00
1) 21,348,228.00 ERRECA'S HANSON
SJH
2) 22,122,180.65 W.R.CONNELLY
INC
3) 22,495,209.50 HAZARD CONSTRUCTION
4) 22,659,624.76 HERZOG CONTRACTING
5) 22,811,525.00 GRANITE CONSTRUCTION
6) 22,927,867.60 FCI CONSTRUCTORS
7) 23,428,976.95 KIEWIT PACIFIC
CO
The responses to
bidder' inquiries, unless incorporated into a formal addenda to the contract,
are not a part of the contract and are provided for the bidder's convenience
only. In some instances, the question and answer may represent a summary
of the matters discussed rather than a word-for-word recitation. The responses
may be considered along with all other information furnished to prospective
bidders for the purpose of bidding on the project. The availability or
use of information provided in the responses to bidder' inquiries is not
to be construed in any way as a waiver of the provisions of Section 2-1.03
of the Standard Specifications or any other provision of the contract,
the plans, Standard Specifications or Special Provisions, nor to excuse
the contractor from full compliance with those contract requirements. Bidders
are cautioned that subsequent responses or contract addenda may affect
or vary a response previously given.
Caltrans District 11 Construction Department
has developed this method of answering Bidder's Inquiries to better serve
the needs of the Contractors who bid on our Projects. Only when stated
in the Special Provisions will contracts have posted INQUIRIES AND RESPONSES.
The BIDDER'S INQUIRIES
& RESPONSES will be updated continuously with the last posting no later
than 15:00 on Wednesday prior to the bid opening.
Caltrans District 11 Construction Department
will post all of the questions submitted by any of the contractors that
are registered Planholders for that Contract, but reserves the right to
not answer any questions deemed unsatisfactory for public viewing.
|
07/17/00 |
09/06/00 |
09/15/00 |
09/29/00 |
|
|
Inquiry |
|
|
When will the cross sections be available
and where?
5560 Ruffin Road Suite 5 San Diego, CA 92123 (858) 541-1500 FAX (858) 278-0558 e-mail to MESA@flashnet.com |
|
|
How do we obtain full size plan sheets?
They can be printed directly from the above
listed site or downloaded for printing at any available reprographics company.
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Bid
Item #43 Roadway Excavation
This project has a substantial amount of earthwork which requires off-site disposal. Does Caltrans intend to provide disposal area(s) for this material?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Special
Provisions, Section 10-1.21 MAINTAINING TRAFFIC, Page 90 (Navajo Road Undercrossing
Traffic Openings)& Plan Sheet #141.
Contract Plan Sheet 141 (SC-17) "Stage Construction Traffic Handling Plan", Section B-B shows 2 ea 41' K-Rail openings, whereas, Special Provisions Section 10-1.21 "Maintaining Traffic", page 90, calls for 2 ea 53' Vehicle openings. Which one is correct?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=
It appears as though work is currently being performed which is a part of this bid proposal. Is this correct? If so, what is the extent of these changes & how will it affect these plans and quantities?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Special
Provisions Section 5-1.02
Are suppliers for the project subject to prevailing wage requirements for both manufacturing & delivery?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Special
Provisions Section 5-1.02
Is trucking for disposal of material off-site subject to prevailing wage requirements?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Special
Provisions Section 10-1.11
The size of the gravel bags per this section is much larger than industry standard & not readily available. Is additional quantity of standard bag acceptable to match specified bag size?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=
Where can we get plans for the current ongoing project adjacent to the advertised project?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Plan
Sheet D-34
Please clarify the following discrepancy, drain unit #16-c is shown as a 36" APC on profile sheet D-14, and is counted as a 24" APC on drainage summary sheet D-34.
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Plan
Sheet D-33
Please clarify the following discrepancy, drain unit #12-k is shown as a 24" APC on profile sheet D-12, and is counted as a 24" CSP on drainage summary sheet D-33.
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Item
43
We have heard that an additional site for the Future Route 52 work may be available. Is this true, and if so, will an addendum be issued?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Item
43
Erreca's has built a portion of Stage 1 and Stage 5 work north of Navajo Road for Contract 11-010734. This work is not shown in the bid package. From cross-sections provided, it appears that the amount of export material on the project has now increased proportionally. Will the State be issuing an addendum revising the contract?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Plan
sheet 206, EARTHWORK QUANTITIES.
There are quantities listed for "D1..D6". It would appear that these are quantities for building the detours. Some of the embankments will be removed in a later stage. If these detour embankment removals are to be measured and paid as roadway excavation, are the quantities available?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Item
42, Develop water supply. Special Provision Section 10-1.34 states: "Attention
is directed to "Beginning of Work, Time of Completion and Liquidated Damages."
elsewhere in these special provisions, regarding availability of water.
I can find no mention of the subject of availability of water in the referenced section of the Special Provisions.
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=Item
43 ROADWAY EXCAVATION,
Special Provision Section 10-1.35, fourth paragraph states: "Stepped slopes, as shown on the plans or designated by the Engineer, shall be excavated to conform with the typical cross section as shown on the plans.
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=BID
ITEM #119, PLAN SHEET Q-2 SUMMARY OF QUANTITIES
It appears that the bid quantity for
Item#119 is substantially overstated.
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=
Will the project be postponed due to the pending addendum? If so, what will the new bid date be?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=
Materials Information Addendum 2
The Materials Information refers to Attachment A for the mandatory disposal site. Where is Attachment A?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=QUESTION
AFFECTS MULTIPLE ITEMS
ADD #2 MODIFIES THE STAGES OF CONSTRUCTION, BUT NO CHANGES IN QUANTITIES WAS MADE (I.E. K-RAIL, REMOVE K-RAIL, TEMP STRIPING, ETC.). WILL A MODIFICATION OR ADDENDUM BE ISSUED?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=ADDENDUM
#2, SPECIAL PROVISIONS, SECTION 10-1.35 EARTHWORK "Excess material shall
be placed with the future Route 52/125 interchange..."
Now that the earthwork is to excavated on one Caltrans project and placed in a mandatory embankment on another Caltrans project, will the trucking of this material be subject to prevailing wage requirements? If so, does the prevailing wage requirement apply to bona fide owner-operator truckers?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=SITE
INSPECTION THIS MORNING
There are loose piles of broken concrete, broken asphalt, dirt, and debris randomly scattered within the limits of work covered by this contract in the area north of Navajo Road. How are we to address the work involved in loading, sorting, hauling, compacting or disposing of this material? Is this work covered in some pay item? If so, which one? Is this considered incidental to the work and we should anticipate performing this work for no pay since it can be observed in a site visit, as we are frequently advised by Caltrans field staff?
|
|
|
Should our schedule of values under
Water Pollution Control include quantities for the measures for which there
is already a pay item (i.e. silt fence, straw bales, gravel bags, etc....)
if we think more of these measures will be required than is shown on the
plans. As an example, say the plans call for 100 straw bales from
station A to B and our approved plan requires us to install 120 bales from
station A to B. Should we put the cost of the additional 20 bales
in the Water Pollution Control item, or will the extra 20 bales be paid
at the unit price for straw bales?
If the approved SWPPP has the same control measures as shown on the plans, but the measures end up in a different configuration than shown on the plans--will the measures be paid for by the contract item? We ask this question because the special provisions states that any items placed at locations other than as shown on the plans will be paid under Water Pollution Control. Since approval of the SWPPP is the Contractor's ultimate responsibility, we run the risk that none of the measures will be in the exact location as shown on the plans and that we will be paid nothing for all the temporary control measure items. Would you please clarify your intent in this area of work?
|
|
|
Plan Sheet / Specification Reference=BIDDERS
QUESTIONS: NUMBER 21 ROADWAY EXCAVATION HAULED TO MANDATORY SITE IS SUBJECT
TO PREVAILING WAGE REGULATIONS.
Can Caltrans tell us what the total current hourly rate of a standard, dirt hauling, highway type, double dump truck must be, in order to be compliance with the prevailing wage provisions for owner/operators?
|
OTHER LINKS OF INTEREST
BIDDER'S INQUIRIES & RESPONSES